![]() ![]() ![]() This is picked from the 'Start Developer Kits' path. B) open a Cmd windows (i.e., a DOS box) for the target environment (target OS version free vs checked build x86, AMD64, or IA64). Here is a skeleton of the instructions to do so: Steps are: A) Install the Windows driver developer kit (if not already done). It is also known that netperf has compiled using the Windows DDK. The same system was used with the same BIOS/UEFI settings while the shown hardware differences in the table just come down to how each OS was reporting the components/values out-of-the-box.It has been reported that versions of netperf have configured and compiled under Cygwin. Shown below is the system information table of the software/hardware. The same client system was used while switching the Linux/BSD distribution each time and performing a clean install. Using the Phoronix Test Suite, a variety of iperf3 and netperf benchmarks were run with an Intel Core i7 6800K + MSI X99A WORKSTATION + 16GB DDR4 + Samsung 850 EVO SSD 128GB + NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X being the client system. ![]() The BSDs tested for this comparison were FreeBSD 11.0 and DragonFlyBSD 4.6.1. The operating systems ran with these networking benchmarks included Debian 8.6, Ubuntu 16.10, Clear Linux 12020, CentOS 7, and Fedora 25. ![]() With now having netperf in the Phoronix Test Suite as well as iperf3 for the latest open-source benchmarks in our automated cross-platform benchmarking framework, I couldn't help but to run some networking benchmarks on a system when trying out a few different Linux distributions and BSDs to see how the performance compares. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |